Proof in Motion

Surveillance Success Stories

PROOF IN MOTION

Proof in Motion is a series of surveillance clips from previous Frasco investigations, essential for uncovering false claims in insurance and legal cases. Captured by our expert team, these videos provide indisputable, real-time evidence that aids in verifying claims, detecting fraud, and supporting litigation.

Each Proof in Motion clip demonstrates the effectiveness of thorough surveillance investigations, delivering accurate documentation that helps ensure fair outcomes while minimizing risks and protecting assets.

Proof In Motion - Surveillance Clips

Video Library

View Real-Life Footage of Active Subjects

Roofing Rehab Ruse

52 minutes of roofing with an alleged injured elbow. Our surveillance captures undeniable proof of false claims.

Miracle Mobility Moment

16 minutes of active movements with alleged injured limbs, driving pain-free; proof that questions the claim’s validity.

Gardening Gone Wrong

72 minutes of landscaping with an alleged injured shoulder – using tools that directly contradict the claim.

Rocking With Injury

30 minutes of rocking with an alleged shoulder injury. Covert surveillance shows the subject using the injured arm, providing undeniable evidence against their claims.

Crutch Free Grocery

7 minutes of surveillance shows the subject using a crutch briefly, then shopping, loading groceries, and driving without signs of impairment, disproving her injury claims.

Brace Free Labor

65 minutes of surveillance shows the subject wearing a brace and sling, then later performing manual labor without any brace, providing key evidence against his injury claims.

Half Day vs. Full Day

Hours on-site largely impacts desired outcomes. When analyzing Frasco’s surveillance data and industry findings over a period of 10 years, we have established that:

  • Full days (minimum of 8 hours) are 46% more likely to produce video
  • Full days result in nearly 9x more video than half days (typically 4 hours)

Half-day surveillance is only recommended in circumstances where a subject is determined to not be at home or not living at a provided or developed address. If a subject is home, full days of surveillance is recommended. For one of our top clients, investigative providers get video on 75% on full day cases versus 35% on half-day cases.

With full-day surveillance, you will get the most value out of the investigation and yield the best ROI. If you require assistance in crafting the right action plan, please contact your dedicated Investigative Consultant.

Comparison of half-day and full-day surveillance options, detailing coverage hours and investigation depth.

Ready to

Decide Without Doubt™?